When we actually practiced it in the sim, as busy as it got, it wasn't unusual for us to still mix it up. We have event driven FMS so I only had to press a button to switch over the FMS. Even when we knew that we wouldР’В get a V1 cut, we would brief to the point of deciding who would press what buttons and switches, the holding pattern entry, everything.

WhenР’В our department first started, we used APG. 'I've been flying these (corporate)Р’В aircraft for over 30 years. ' I wanted to let you know that the program you put together for the Falcon 200 is excellent, and has proven to be a very beneficial preflight tool for our operation.' EFB-Pro wonderfully ties all the regs to the performance charts in a very intuitive and safeР’В manner. Obviously, this can not be done,Р’В in any practical sense, by hand. After reading your book, it became very clear that the information was there but needed to be 'mined out'. 'I used to think that the AFM did not provide enough information to calculate obstacle clearance, and in particular departure gradients. As a charter operator, we will be using the EFB-Pro for all our performance and weight and balance needs.' Thanks for the great product and customer support. Their methods are sound, proven, and provide an easy way to navigate the difficult problem of ensuring obstacle clearance by just using the AFM alone. CAVU has demonstrated to us that they are the leading experts in this area, and have gone out of their way to accommodate the needs of our flight department, and to help ensure that we are safe and compliant.

'We are convinced that the only way to properly and efficiently comply with obstacle clearance requirements is with the use of a performance calculator like the EFB-Pro. I will most certainly recommend it to my many peers at Pegasus! Thank you so much for putting together such a fantastic product for our community. IР’В just finished reading your wonderful book on my iPad this morning (again). Was spot on for climb required and takeoff distance! EFB-PRO also gave me an extra 1,000 lbs of payload I would have left behind using Ultra Nav. Ultra Nav said it was extending second segment. Both programs said it was 2 nd segment limited. While running comparisons for departure out of Driggs Idaho I received impressive results. It provides the limit weighs for each phase not just the most limiting one. It is easy to use which means it actually gets used on every leg. I like the KISS principle and this keeps things as simple as possible if something were to go wrong.Р”Сћ. It uses the Net takeoff flight path as used by the AFM. We really like this program and feel that it is a great enhancement to the safety of our operation for the following reasons:Р”РЋ. We just finished a 16 leg four day trip while trying out EFB-PRO. Thanks again, you have been a great help! I really love the W&B, I am glad I spent the $! Whats also really helpful is the Contaminated Runway Charts for Takeoff & Landing and the turn-around time calculation which we use all the time in the Beechjet 400A. I have used the new EFB-Pro and it is GREAT! It is really very, very helpful! On the runway analysis you actually have to manually adjust the numbers based on whether or not you have a headwind or tailwind.

Nbaa airmail